Cognizing Consciousness

Humans are remarkably fuel-efficient, or at least, our brains are. The lump of tissue inside our skulls is three times larger than that of a chimp, and it needs a lot more energy to run. But for our size, we burn about as much energy as a chimp. We’re no gas-guzzlers, so how did we compensate for the high energy demands of our brains? In 1995, Leslie Aiello and Peter Wheeler proposed an answer – we sacrificed guts for smarts. The duo suggested that during our evolution, there was a trade-off between the sizes of two energetically expensive organs: our guts and our brain. We moved towards a more energy-rich diet of meat and tubers, and we took a lot of the digestive work away from our bowels by cooking our food before eating it. Our guts can afford to be much smaller than expected for a mammal of our size, and the energy freed up by these shrunken bowels can power our mighty brains. This attractive and intuitive idea – the so-called “expensive tissue hypothesis” became a popular one. Bu tAna Navarrete from the University of Zurich thinks she has disproved it. (… read more)

Humans are remarkably fuel-efficient, or at least, our brains are. The lump of tissue inside our skulls is three times larger than that of a chimp, and it needs a lot more energy to run. But for our size, we burn about as much energy as a chimp. We’re no gas-guzzlers, so how did we compensate for the high energy demands of our brains? In 1995, Leslie Aiello and Peter Wheeler proposed an answer – we sacrificed guts for smarts.

The duo suggested that during our evolution, there was a trade-off between the sizes of two energetically expensive organs: our guts and our brain. We moved towards a more energy-rich diet of meat and tubers, and we took a lot of the digestive work away from our bowels by cooking our food before eating it. Our guts can afford to be much smaller than expected for a mammal of our size, and the energy freed up by these shrunken bowels can power our mighty brains.

This attractive and intuitive idea – the so-called “expensive tissue hypothesis” became a popular one. Bu tAna Navarrete from the University of Zurich thinks she has disproved it.

(… read more)

11/9/11
  1. titsinspace reblogged this from eudaimonist
  2. eudaimonist reblogged this from bonedust
  3. pandrewk reblogged this from -iwilldestroyyou
  4. -iwilldestroyyou reblogged this from bonedust
  5. sunshine-daydreamm reblogged this from bonedust
  6. bonedust reblogged this from oldowan
  7. ashleynicole999 reblogged this from aafarensis
  8. plio-cavedeposits reblogged this from oldowan
  9. flashgorman reblogged this from aafarensis
  10. opakakaek reblogged this from cognizingconsciousness
  11. noellejt reblogged this from aafarensis
  12. aafarensis reblogged this from oldowan
  13. mlwxheavyheart reblogged this from oldowan
  14. caezy reblogged this from mlwxheavyheart
  15. trippyscience reblogged this from oldowan
  16. cognizingconsciousness posted this

52 notes

neuroscience  human evolution  primate  brain  science  guts for brains hypothesis 

Accent theme by Handsome Code

Oh, hello you tumblrs: My name is Max. I graduated from Syracuse University May '11 where I studied cognitive neuroscience. Preconscious awareness fascinates me and although my blog will often explore this field of study, I fancy myself a generalist, and plan on posting material from across the many subfields of psychology and neuroscience.

Let's talk about the brain, everybody!

view archive



ASK a question about psychology, cognition, neuroscience. I'll answer as best i can.

SUBMIT your cognitive neuroscience-related posts here.